Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum
#9
(20-09-2013, 08:39 AM)Embolden Wrote: Finally got my grubby mitts on the SM codex and my thoughts are:

No ignoring cover - still rolling to hit and no rule/wording that states ignore cover.

and yes 3HPs caused as the second immobilised result causes a further HP damage.

A bit late to the party, but thats how I'd play it.

Thatd how i read it too! Hence my army is full of grav cannons muahahahaha just waiting for GW to say cover saves cannot be taken (probably being a bit optimistic) so my list is super overpowered! :p
Reply


Messages In This Thread
So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Etched Oracle - 11-09-2013, 05:52 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by sprogmcjob - 11-09-2013, 06:56 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by jaqenhgar - 11-09-2013, 08:05 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Gareth - 11-09-2013, 08:15 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by GoNecrons - 11-09-2013, 08:40 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Embolden - 20-09-2013, 08:39 AM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Nick1988 - 20-09-2013, 11:21 AM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by jaqenhgar - 20-09-2013, 09:50 AM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Nick1988 - 20-09-2013, 11:22 AM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by sprogmcjob - 20-09-2013, 12:49 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Simian - 20-09-2013, 01:42 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Nick1988 - 20-09-2013, 07:42 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Embolden - 21-09-2013, 06:53 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)