Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ (7th edition link on page 7) - Printable Version +- Redditch Tabletop Gamers Forum (https://forum.redditchtabletopgamers.com) +-- Forum: Fantasy and Sci-Fi Miniature Gaming (https://forum.redditchtabletopgamers.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=35) +--- Forum: Warhammer 40K (https://forum.redditchtabletopgamers.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ (7th edition link on page 7) (/showthread.php?tid=914) |
RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - manrogue - 24-04-2013 (24-04-2013, 08:05 PM)smallpoxeldar Wrote: Hi guysIt is technically legal on a riptide with missile shield drones as drones count as members of the unit, so with drones it is actually a 3 man unit. As I say a mistake on there part and will be faq'd. Edit- deleted multiple posts, post 6 times for some reason! Stupid new phone! RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - smallpoxeldar - 26-04-2013 Sorry Vince forgot the drones are part of the unit so ye it is correct then, I always thought the Riptide should be a Character MC anyhow. RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - jaqenhgar - 26-04-2013 (24-04-2013, 11:09 AM)Simian Wrote:Quote:Page 99 – Deathwing Terminator Squad, Optionsgreat....so my terminator sergeant who doesn't have a storm bolter and powerfist cant take a Storm shield and Thunder hammer any more.....what a joke. so the sergeants have to take a power sword? bit pants, oh well. Better paint a few more power swords... RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - jaqenhgar - 26-04-2013 happy about extra black knights on command squad and the fact that the hurricaine bolter and banner of dev combo is allowed. RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - Simian - 26-04-2013 @jaqenhgar It has to be a mistake. I may just be ignoring this.... Quote:happy about extra black knights on command squad and the fact that the hurricaine bolter and banner of dev combo is allowed.yes these are both good. RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - manrogue - 26-04-2013 (26-04-2013, 03:13 PM)Simian Wrote: @jaqenhgarI'm sure people wouldn't mind if we had a house rule that they can swap out power sword for TH/SS as i think they made a mistake. It will be FAQ'd on the next one i bet..... RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - Simian - 26-04-2013 Manrogue if people are ok with it that would be great. i do have some Power sword options but its seems crazy to remove that option. it has to be a mistake made when they were trying to allow TH/SS+Cyclone RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - Simian - 01-05-2013 ok reconcile this for me. FAQ - BRB Q: Do embarked passengers with ‘area of effect’ wargear, measure the range of such items from the hull of the transport they are embarked upon? (p78) A: Yes. FAQ - DA Page 64 – Power Field Generator Add “If the bearer is embarked upon a Transport vehicle, the powerfield’s effects only apply to models embarked upon that vehicle”. nice targeted hit on Dark angels only.... RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - jaqenhgar - 01-05-2013 Seems like they nerfed the DA one because it was too powerful in combination with landraiders if the pfg is inside one. With orks the BW's are AV14 on the front armour only, and usully open-topped so are much easier to destroy, plus I think the KFF is only a 5+ save on vehicles now? So consistency wise it's unfair, but probably a game balance issue. RE: Official GW 40K Errata and FAQ - Simian - 01-05-2013 Quote:KFF is only a 5+ save on vehicles now?that would make more sense. i thought it was a 4+ as well. still, its not consistent which is the annoying thing. i dont mind which ruling is used as long as its consistent. BW's are AV14 only on front? i thought it was front as side. Hmmm thats more interesting. |