10-01-2014, 03:01 PM
Nees to prove this guy wrong!!!
Well that looks like 25 Highlander lists so should be 25 easy wins for the serious players players in round one! After that we Highlander chaps can get on with having some fun on the bottom tables
....but wait!
That still leaves around 35 serious players with waac armies who will have lost their first game and will be playing the Highlander lists who lost their first game. So assuming a waac list will beat a highlander list every time it will take at least two rounds before the bottom 25 slots are entirely made up of the highlander players
...but wait!
At that point the Highlander players who are playing each other will have to win a game (in the third round) and the waac players who are playing each other will have to lose a game. So waac players will play Highlander players again in round four.
I'm not sure how this will affect the outcome....not much at the very top I suspect unless someone gets to 'bounce' a highlander list on game five and shoot up the tables. I think that having 'easy' wins scattered throughout the bottom half of the table will mean that the middle of the table will not be representative and will be based on the luck of the draw.
Of course I am sure that Tim has thought about all of this and has a cunning plan!
My head hurts!
Grim
Well that looks like 25 Highlander lists so should be 25 easy wins for the serious players players in round one! After that we Highlander chaps can get on with having some fun on the bottom tables
....but wait!
That still leaves around 35 serious players with waac armies who will have lost their first game and will be playing the Highlander lists who lost their first game. So assuming a waac list will beat a highlander list every time it will take at least two rounds before the bottom 25 slots are entirely made up of the highlander players
...but wait!
At that point the Highlander players who are playing each other will have to win a game (in the third round) and the waac players who are playing each other will have to lose a game. So waac players will play Highlander players again in round four.
I'm not sure how this will affect the outcome....not much at the very top I suspect unless someone gets to 'bounce' a highlander list on game five and shoot up the tables. I think that having 'easy' wins scattered throughout the bottom half of the table will mean that the middle of the table will not be representative and will be based on the luck of the draw.
Of course I am sure that Tim has thought about all of this and has a cunning plan!
My head hurts!
Grim